Both the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and House Armed Services Committee passed bipartisan increases to the Department of Defense’s budget request for fiscal year 2022. This investment would result in ~3% real growth for funding to train and equip America’s military and serve as a necessary corrective to the Biden Administration’s defense budget request, which called for a real cut despite the urgent challenge presented by China. Following the example set by the Senate and House Armed Services Committees, Congress should pass defense authorization and appropriation bills with a significant and necessary topline increase. This needs to be done before September 30 (the end of the federal government’s fiscal year) in order to ensure stability and predictability not only in terms of budgeting but also to ensure programs are not slipped and the industrial base is not negatively impacted.
A higher topline is not an end in itself, however. Additional resources – both for procurement and modernization -- for America’s military will only be valuable to the extent they are tightly focused on measures that meaningfully enhance the ability to deter and, if necessary, defeat aggression in the most pressing and realistic scenarios. In particular, as the SASC-passed bill emphasizes, additional resources should be focused on maintaining the ability to deny a Chinese fait accompli against Taiwan.
While the Biden budget request appeared primarily focused on ensuring America’s military advantage in the long-term, Congress should also ensure a proper balance of investment by increasing resources for preserving a credible conventional deterrent in the near to medium term. America’s security can no longer depend on defense budgets that treat China solely as a long-term challenge.
Moreover, Congress must avoid using increased resources simply to reverse divestments proposed in this year’s budget request. To be clear, some proposed divestments, such as premature Navy ship retirements, should be rejected. Yet, by supporting the divestment or retirement of systems that have already outlived their usefulness against China or Russia, while using increased resources to procure newer systems on near-term timelines, Congress can help accelerate the shift to a more combat-credible force.
As Congress considers the best way to use increased DoD resources for both procurement and modernization, here are some key areas for targeted investment:
Shipbuilding
Fighter Aircraft & Unmanned Systems
Munitions & Long-Range Strike
Posture
Enabling Capabilities
Readiness, Maintenance & Logistics
Taiwan has a central role in global semiconductor production, and the defense of Taiwan will be vital to maintaining U.S. access to these advanced chips. Read FAL's report on what the U.S. should do to guarantee continued access to semiconductors.
President Biden is supporting a new round of talks with Maduro's regime in Venezuela. Read more about the negotiations, U.S. interests, leverage, and what our redlines should be.
Opponents of nuclear modernization have recently seized on analysis from the CBO, falsely suggesting a sudden increase in the project cost of U.S. nuclear forces. Twisting their analysis is merely the latest attempt to undermine nuclear modernization.
Copyright © 2022 Forum for American Leadership - All Rights Reserved.